It was reported that the patient had a procedure on (b)(6) 2014 with a bifurcated, a suprarenal, and an infrarenal aortic extension.On (b)(6) 2015 patient was admitted emergently with a component separation and rupture.Physician attempted to bridge the components with a competitor device and was unsuccessful and patient expired.
|
Based upon the clinical assessment, the reported component separation and a type iiia endoleak was confirmed.Fifteen months post implant, there was evidence to support: a complete component separation; partial stent collapse of the main body; type iiia endoleak; slight progressive dilation of the superior stent margin of the main body stent to 3.5 cm, and rupture.The death, or cause of death could not be substantiated due to lack of information.A manufacturing record review was performed and the lot met all release criteria with no issues or deviations that would explain the reported event.Based upon the investigation findings, a design or manufacturing root cause was not be identified based upon the available information.However, factors that may have contributed to the event include: product use was incongruent with the ifu due to: the conical 26% change in the aortic neck diameter; aortic neck length less than 1.5 cm; and, the ruptured state of the left proximal aorta.Cautionary product use conditions that might have contributed to this event included: the severe calcifications at the aortic neck and iliac arteries; and the near 90° posterior angulation of the iliac arteries.Patient factors that might have contributed to this event included: antiplatelet therapy (aspirin).
|