• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX; SUPRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX, INC. AFX; SUPRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION Back to Search Results
Model Number A28-28/C95-O20 V
Device Problems Material Rupture (1546); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Death (1802)
Event Date 10/16/2015
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device involved in the event will not be returned for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Additional devices: model: a28-28/c95 v infrarenal aortic extension lot: 1164428-009 rel.Date: 3/13/2014 exp.Date: 2/11/2015.Model: ba25-90/i20-30 bifurcated lot: 1257009-009 rel.Date: 6/16/2014 exp.Date: 4/30/2017.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had a procedure on (b)(6) 2014 with a bifurcated, a suprarenal, and an infrarenal aortic extension.On (b)(6) 2015 patient was admitted emergently with a component separation and rupture.Physician attempted to bridge the components with a competitor device and was unsuccessful and patient expired.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based upon the clinical assessment, the reported component separation and a type iiia endoleak was confirmed.Fifteen months post implant, there was evidence to support: a complete component separation; partial stent collapse of the main body; type iiia endoleak; slight progressive dilation of the superior stent margin of the main body stent to 3.5 cm, and rupture.The death, or cause of death could not be substantiated due to lack of information.A manufacturing record review was performed and the lot met all release criteria with no issues or deviations that would explain the reported event.Based upon the investigation findings, a design or manufacturing root cause was not be identified based upon the available information.However, factors that may have contributed to the event include: product use was incongruent with the ifu due to: the conical 26% change in the aortic neck diameter; aortic neck length less than 1.5 cm; and, the ruptured state of the left proximal aorta.Cautionary product use conditions that might have contributed to this event included: the severe calcifications at the aortic neck and iliac arteries; and the near 90° posterior angulation of the iliac arteries.Patient factors that might have contributed to this event included: antiplatelet therapy (aspirin).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX
Type of Device
SUPRARENAL AORTIC EXTENSION
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOLOGIX, INC.
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
henry to
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
9495984772
MDR Report Key5225803
MDR Text Key31259709
Report Number2031527-2015-00449
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/20/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/20/2015
Device Model NumberA28-28/C95-O20 V
Device Lot Number1246587-002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age72 YR
-
-