(b)(4) it was reported that a female patient in her 70¿s underwent an idiopathic ventricular tachycardia procedure with an ez steer nav ds bi-directional electrophysiology catheter and suffered a cardiac perforation.The returned device was visually inspected upon receipt and it was found in normal conditions.Per the event reported, a deflection test was performed and the catheter passed.The catheter was also evaluated for eeprom, carto 3 and sensor functionality.The catheter was recognized by carto 3 system, no error messages were displayed and the catheter was properly visualized.Eeprom data demonstrates the catheter was properly calibrated during manufacturing.The catheter was tested for electrical performance, temperature response and stockert compatibility and it was found within specifications.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the dhr review verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.The catheter passed all specifications.The root cause of the cardiac perforation remains unknown.The ifu states that careful catheter manipulation must be performed in order to avoid cardiac damage, perforation or tamponade.The root cause does not appear to be manufactured related.
|