• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 6-8MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 6-8MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 180706-1
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 11/06/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The following other devices were also listed in this report: mck tibial baseplate-lm/rl-sz 6; cat# 180606; lot# 26160214-01.Mck femoral-lm-rl-sz 5; cat# 180505; lot# 415610-m.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's pain.An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Additional information has been requested.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Dr.(b)(6) performed a revision on a previous medial mako knee to a total knee replacement.Patient revised due to persistent pain in left knee.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding pain involving a mako insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method and results: medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the most common reason for persistent pain requiring revision of a unicondylar to a total knee arthroplasty is progression of osteoarthritis to the other knee compartments.There is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation.Device history review: indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: not performed as no device specific failure modes were identified.Conclusions: a review of the provided records by a clinical consultant indicated there is no evidence that factors of faulty component design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation.A capa trend analysis was conducted for the reported failure mode and concluded pain may result from other factors not necessarily related to the device.Product surveillance will continue to monitor for trends.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time as no devices and/or insufficient information was received by stryker orthopaedics.If devices and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Dr.(b)(6) performed a revision on a previous medial mako knee to a total knee replacement.Patient revised due to persistent pain in left knee.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MCK TIBIAL ONLAY INSERT-SZ 6-8MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
keyla navedo
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key5248519
MDR Text Key32097115
Report Number3005985723-2015-00278
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/06/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/24/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2019
Device Catalogue Number180706-1
Device Lot Number12060414-1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/22/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-