• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTEGRA NEUROSCIENCES, LTD PRE-AMP CABLE, SPM-1 CONNECTS MONITOR TO CATHETE; N/A

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTEGRA NEUROSCIENCES, LTD PRE-AMP CABLE, SPM-1 CONNECTS MONITOR TO CATHETE; N/A Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PAC2
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Grounding Malfunction (1271); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Connection Problem (2900)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This is the eighth of twelve reports (same reporter, same problem, same product id, different serial numbers).It was reported that the receptacle that engages the catheter was not connected to the ground.When touched, the mpm-1 monitor showed an interference and the spm-1 monitor showed an error.A multimeter was used to check this problem.The cables are new and never been used.The issue was discovered by the distributor.There was no patient involvement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Integra has completed their internal investigation on 20apr2016.The investigation included: methods: evaluation of actual device.Review of device history records.Review of complaint history.Results: evaluation of device: cables tested within specifications.The failure analysis investigation encompassed visual inspection, functional testing and review of videos provided by the customer.The customer reported that the monitor shows interference at mpm-1; pac2 cables are designed to be used with spm-1 monitor and not mpm-1 monitor.The customer communicated that the mpm-1 monitor was used for ¿better view of the problem in graphic¿, thus it can be concluded that the reported failure is not related to pac2 cables.The customer reported that the monitor show error in spm-1; calibration records of spm-1 monitors used by the customer for pac2 cables incoming inspection testing were reviewed; last service history record on integra system was for preventative maintenance on 06-sep-2006.It was noted that the calibration of spm-1 monitors is carried out annually by a trained calibration technician from customer¿s repair centre, however no training record or spm-1 monitor calibration record was provided by the customer for review.The videos provided by the customer illustrated an issue with ¿no continuity¿; pac2 cables were modified in 2009/2010 to modification level 2 so that the grounding is clipped back to the outer sheath resulting in no continuity; all returned pac2 cables were manufactured as modification level 2 based on the date of manufacture, thus no impact on issue with continuity.Review of dhr documentation of serial numbers of good cables provided by the customer was completed; ¿good cables¿ were manufactured pre re-design change as modification level 1, thus would show continuity and would have no impact on complaint incident.Finally, it was noted that the customer is concerned about the radio and tv transmission towers located in close proximity to test facility.Based on the information provided by the customer, the towers which generate a strong radio frequency may be a contributory factor to the complaint incident, thus a possible impact on complaint incident.The analysis of the complaint investigation identified no issue.All results of the functionality tests were recorded as within specification and final release checks were performed satisfactory prior to the cable been released.The complaint incident was initiated for monitor cable pac2 therefore there is no service history to be reviewed.The dhr review has been deemed satisfactory.A minimum of 12 month review of pac2 cable customer complaints was completed using the following key words ¿cable to monitor connection failure¿ and a root cause ¿could not duplicate¿ in the search criteria.This review encompassed from dates 11-nov-2014 to 11-apr-2016.A total of (b)(4) complaints were reviewed of which (b)(4) complaints met the search criteria.The analysis of the complaint investigations and root cause reports has concluded complaint incident is the (b)(4) identified complaint for the reported failure associated with pac2 cable that could not be duplicated.Since the complaint incident could not be duplicated and the pac2 cables were verified as working within specifications, no root cause can be established.Linked to mfg report numbers: 8010219-2015-00053, 8010219-2015-00062, 8010219-2015-00051, 8010219-2015-00052, 8010219-2015-00054, 8010219-2015-00055, 8010219-2015-00056, 8010219-2015-00058, 8010219-2015-00059, 8010219-2015-00060, 8010219-2015-00061.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRE-AMP CABLE, SPM-1 CONNECTS MONITOR TO CATHETE
Type of Device
N/A
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTEGRA NEUROSCIENCES, LTD
newbury road
newbury road
andover hampshire
UK 
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES (IRELAND) LTD.
newbury road
sragh tullamore, co. offaly
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
rowena bunuan
311 enterprise drive
plainsboro, NJ 08536
6099362393
MDR Report Key5250203
MDR Text Key32305305
Report Number8010219-2015-00057
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GWM
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K031086
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/04/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/25/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue NumberPAC2
Device Lot NumberTL-325153
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/17/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-