It successfully passed in the criteria of manufacturing and inspection as a result of confirmation of device history record for this device.It was identified that stent was severely damaged during procedure via medical image.As a result of analysis of returned device, several spots were fractured on the proximal part of stent and silicone coating was severely damaged.It is considered that retrieval suture on the proximal part was fallen out based on returned device without suture.No fracture was found on distal part of stent without any damage on silicone coating, while proximal part was severely damaged.It is regarded that stent was pressured by circumstances during procedure such as patient's bended lesion, location of stent based on state of severely damaged stent prior to removal; it was fractured on the proximal part and it was damaged on the silicone coated part accordingly.However, it is impossible to identify the exact root cause since there is no information of patient and it is hard to recreate the situation at the time of procedure.There was no patient's injury caused by this fracture, however we decided to report mdr since there is possibility of injury in the future.The suspected device is not registered to u.S.Fda and it has not been shipped to u.S.Monitoring is being conducted for the similar case by this firm.
|