Catalog Number JH-05500-J |
Device Problem
Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/09/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device sample was not returned for evaluation at the time of this report.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer alleges after insertion of the catheter, the user found the proximal tip of the catheter was deformed.As a result, the catheter was removed and a new catheter was re-inserted.No patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Visual, functional and dimensional inspection could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no relevant findings.A corrective action is not required at this time as the potential cause of a deformed epidural catheter could not be determined based upon the information provided and without a sample.Complaint verification testing could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related cause.The potential cause of a deformed epidural catheter could not be determined based upon the information provided and without a sample.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer alleges after insertion of the catheter, the user found the proximal tip of the catheter was deformed.As a result, the catheter was removed and a new catheter was re-inserted.No patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The customer returned one epidural catheter for investigation.The catheter was received in the protective tube assembly.A visual exam was performed and the catheter appeared to be used.The distal tip of the catheter was partially occluded with biological material.No defects were found with the extrusion or coil wire.Visual examination of the proximal end revealed that the extrusion was partially stretched; however, the opening was intact and the assembly of the extrusion over the coil wire was typical.No defects were observed.The returned epidural catheter was functionally tested and no leaks were detected.The reported complaint of a visible defect at the proximal end of the catheter was not confirmed based upon the sample received.The proximal end of the catheter appeared to have a slightly stretched extrusion; however, this anomaly did not affect the functionality of the device and is not considered to be a defect at this time as the catheter could be inserted into a snaplock adapter and passed both a flow and leak test.A dhr review was performed on the epidural catheter with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related cause.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer alleges after insertion of the catheter, the user found the proximal tip of the catheter was deformed.As a result, the catheter was removed and a new catheter was re-inserted.No patient injury reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|