Evaluation summary: visual and tactile inspection were performed on the device: a wide stretched area was found on the shaft after the end of the strain relief and the proximal balloon welding was found stretched as well.No further issues were found.Evident traces of blood were found on the device.The balloon was found folded.The guide wire lumen was flushed, but, due to the damaged portion of the shaft, it was not possible to insert the 0 ,035¿¿ guide wire.The purging procedure was performed with no issues.In order to verify the correct profile of the balloon, the device was inserted in a 6f introducer sheath.No resistance was felt both during insertion and extraction.No other issues were found.(b)(4).
|
Physician was attempting to treat a lesion in the sfa using in.Pact admiral paclitaxel eluting balloon catheter.The lesion is severely calcified and vessel exhibited little tortuosity.The device was removed from packaging as per ifu, inspected and prepped with no issues noted.It was reported that the lesion was pre dilated with a 6mm admiral xtreme balloon catheter successfully.The device was advanced to the target lesion but it failed to cross the lesion.Severe resistance was encountered when advancing the device.The physician felt as if it was a wire tracking issue with the dcb.A regular admiral was successfully used for pre-dilatation.After pre-dilation the in.Pact admiral was advanced but was unable to cross lesion.Physician noted that a lot of pull back withdrawal force was used to remove in.Pact admiral.Physician believes that it was a wire issue.The in.Pact admiral dcb was delivered over a 0.035 glide advantage wire.After the in.Pact admiral did not cross the physician went in with a 0.035 admiral, crossed the lesion, and angioplastied the lesion.Got great results and then the case was done.When the device was returned to the manufacturing facility, it was noted that the shaft was stretched.
|