• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES MEZZOVICO PSI SD800.401 PEEK IMPLANT; PLATE,CRANIOPLASTY,PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES MEZZOVICO PSI SD800.401 PEEK IMPLANT; PLATE,CRANIOPLASTY,PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SD800.401
Device Problem Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
Patient Problem Sedation (2368)
Event Date 09/17/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Implant date sometime in (b)(6) 2015.Not explanted.(b)(6).Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device history records was conducted.The report indicates that the: manufacturing site: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 20 july 2015 part sd800.401 lot 9577746, no ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported implant did not fit patient, surgery was performed in (b)(6).The surgery time extended 60 minutes.Patient requires further scan to design new psi.This complaint involves one part (b)(4).This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A product development evaluation was completed: the complaint is unconfirmed as the device was made according to the form the surgeon signed approval documentation.The reconstruction was designed according the visual defect represented in the patients ct dataset.However, the provided ct dataset had a slice thickness of 2.5mm instead of the requested 1.0mm for the original data.Besides that, there was derived data with a 0.625mm slice thickness available, but as this dataset is recalculated from the original dataset, it should not be used, as it would contain the same uncertainties, as the original data with the 2.5mm slice thickness.If the trumatch cmf team detects such a case, where the ct data quality is not according our specification, then the surgeon will be asked to provide the trumatch cmf team with a new ct dataset or give an according e-mail approval that the use of the provided ct dataset is ok with the surgeon.At the time point the ct dataset for case 215464 was segmented, the trumatch cmf team did work on a project in collaboration with materialise to let materialise segment the ct data, using their interface software proplan cmf online to exchange case data including ct data.Therefore the before mentioned communication e-mail was not send out.However, the use of 2.5mm ct dataset to design the plate was also highlighted on the images for approval documentation that need to be signed by the surgeon to approve the proposed psi design proposal.The following effects that do occur in this case may influence the quality of an orbital floor reconstruction, using a peek psi: thin bone thickness in the orbital floor region, combined with the slice thickness of 2.5mm may lead to undetected bone structure, a present, metallic orbital floor implant, that was segmented out form the ct dataset may negatively influence the interpretation of the bony structure due to the metallic artifacts, due to the limited access to the bony structure in this anatomical region, it may be difficult to clean the bone from the soft tissue, to assure a proper fit of the psi implant, as the slice thickness and metallic orbital floor implant removal is highlighted in the order and images for approval, that need to be signed by the surgeon, we focus in this complaint evaluation on the cleaning of the bone interface.No product related fault could be detected; the device was made according to the form the surgeon signed approval.Device was not implanted/explanted.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PSI SD800.401 PEEK IMPLANT
Type of Device
PLATE,CRANIOPLASTY,PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES MEZZOVICO
zona industriale 4
mezzovico CH680 5
SZ  CH6805
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES MEZZOVICO
zona industriale 4
mezzovico CH680 5
SZ   CH6805
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5271778
MDR Text Key32865485
Report Number1000562954-2015-10213
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK053199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/16/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/07/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSD800.401
Device Lot Number9577746
Other Device ID Number(01)10887587064789(10)9577746
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/23/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/20/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-