|
Model Number 8162815 |
Device Problem
Data Problem (3196)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/15/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens' initial assessment of the issue on october 20, 2015 was deemed a non-critical display issue only.Following the completion of a full investigation of results, and root cause analysis that concluded on november 10, 2015, this issue is now considered to be a reportable event as the potential exists for system malfunction.Investigation into the reported issue shows that the user tried to load and unload the patient multiple times for unknown reasons.During this workflow a cache was not deleted and an incorrect internal identifier attached to the image, which led to the display of an incorrect patient name.In turn, the image was stored under the displayed patient´s folder.The reference image used in adaptive targeting would then be the image of the incorrect patient, which could lead to wrong offset values for patient positioning.Siemens has not received any reports of mistreatment or injury to a patient.The root cause of this software error could not be identified.It is assumed that there was a signal timing-problem during the multifold patient load/unload process.In the present case the user immediately recognized the incorrect patient name.The complaint behavior was not reproducible and has been identified as an isolated incident.Considering this, no corrective action is initiated.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer notified siemens on (b)(6) 2015 that when they completed setup images and verification images, two patients were mixed up.Reportedly, the customer loaded a patient, that was previously treated, from candelis.Setup and verification images were completed and the patient was treated.After treatment the customer closed the patient on the rt therapist (rtt).The customer loaded another patient, that was not previously treated, directly from candelis.The treatment plan was loaded and setup images were completed however the images are labeled with the name of the patient that was previously treated.In a case where the reported mixup of patient reference images occurs after the described special workflow, it is possible that the user may not be aware that the issue has occurred, which could lead to a wrong offset calculation for patient positioning.However, there is no report of mistreatment or injury to a patient.The issue occurred shortly after the rt therapist was updated to version 4.3.1 mr2.The customer performed the same workflow on another artiste with an older version of rtt on-site without any problem.This reported issue occurred in (b)(6).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|