Though no medical/surgical intervention was required to preclude a serious injury in this event, there have been previously reported events involving a similar device that resulted in the need for medical/surgical intervention to preclude permanent damage to a body structure or permanent impairment of a body function.Therefore, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.The device is available for evaluation, though results are not available as of this report.Evaluation results will be submitted as they become available.
|
As received, the attachment could support the reported complaint however, a root cause could not be determined.Production and quality testing of the attachment was not performed as the device was not in working condition.Microscopic evaluation revealed dent on the head.Based on the pictures there is the possibility that the attachment was dropped.The cap and set assemblies were detached from the head assembly.The bur end bearing was stuck inside head cavity.Attachment was sent to (b)(4) for further evaluation.Based on the results from (b)(4) the root cause for cap coming off could not be determine.Results from (b)(4) stated the housing of the head is damaged, the teeth are strongly worn, rust on the parts, contact between the cap button and pusher, no signs of loctite on the cap threads.Unable to determine the exact cause of the cap unscrewing, per (b)(4) evaluation damage to the head, debris and gear wear could be contributing factor.Possible chemical breakdown of the loctite.
|