Mitek medical safety department discovered this published white paper detailing a historical event in which some mitek devices were implicated.It cannot be confirmed that this issue had been previously reported to mitek, so an adverse event report is being filed to document the experience described in the article.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, this file will remains receptive to any potential forthcoming information received that is pertinent and germane to this issue.Mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.O.Udi: unavailable.Depuy synthes has been informed that the catalog number and lot number is not available.
|
The following issue was discovered via a published journal article by the mitek medical affairs officer.Authors: kenneth cutbush and kieran m.Hirpara.Reference: arthroscopic latarjet stabilization of the shoulder with capsulolabral repair address: brisbane hand and upper limb research institute and department of surgery, school of medicine, university of queensland, brisbane, australia.Email: research@upperlimb.Com.The procedure had been performed on 15 patients between january 2011 and august 2014 where all of the patients were males.One patient reported severe neural-type pain following the procedure, and on repeat arthroscopy the next day it was felt that the capsular repair was too tight.Release of the inferior-most anchor was performed with complete resolution of the pain immediately postoperatively.Presumably, the labral repair had been too tight and resulted in traction of the axillary nerve.
|