• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK; ANCHOR IMPLANTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK; ANCHOR IMPLANTS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK GRYPHON
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Mitek medical safety department discovered this published white paper detailing a historical event in which some mitek devices were implicated.It cannot be confirmed that this issue had been previously reported to mitek, so an adverse event report is being filed to document the experience described in the article.At this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, this file will remains receptive to any potential forthcoming information received that is pertinent and germane to this issue.Mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.O.Udi: unavailable.Depuy synthes has been informed that the catalog number and lot number is not available.
 
Event Description
The following issue was discovered via a published journal article by the mitek medical affairs officer.Authors: kenneth cutbush and kieran m.Hirpara.Reference: arthroscopic latarjet stabilization of the shoulder with capsulolabral repair address: brisbane hand and upper limb research institute and department of surgery, school of medicine, university of queensland, brisbane, australia.Email: research@upperlimb.Com.The procedure had been performed on 15 patients between january 2011 and august 2014 where all of the patients were males.One patient reported severe neural-type pain following the procedure, and on repeat arthroscopy the next day it was felt that the capsular repair was too tight.Release of the inferior-most anchor was performed with complete resolution of the pain immediately postoperatively.Presumably, the labral repair had been too tight and resulted in traction of the axillary nerve.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NI
Type of Device
ANCHOR IMPLANTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
joseph cipollo
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5089773839
MDR Report Key5284547
MDR Text Key33234032
Report Number1221934-2015-10123
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PNI
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/10/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK GRYPHON
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer11/11/2015
Date Manufacturer Received11/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-