• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX¿ TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY ULTRAFLEX¿ TRACHEOBRONCHIAL; PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number M00564870
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 11/26/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2015, that an ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent was implanted in the trachea during a stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, this was to treat a 4cm malignant obstruction.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous and was not pre dilated.During the procedure, the physician removed an ultraflex tracheobronchial stent that had been previously placed on an unknown date and was found to have migrated due to the decline in size of the tumor after therapy.The physician then implanted an 18mm x 6cm ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent.There were no issues noted and the stent was implanted successfully.Per the physician, the stent was not dilated after placement.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient informed the physician that he coughed up five pieces of metal that were believed to be part of the 18mm x 6cm ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent.A diagnostic bronchoscopy procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2015 and it was confirmed that the metal pieces were part of the 18mm x 6cm ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent that was placed on (b)(6) 2015.The remainder of the stent was removed using a stent grasper and rat tooth forceps.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An ultraflex tracheobronchial stent and five wire pieces were returned for analysis.A visual examination of the returned device components noted the stent had multiple fractures and the stent suture at one end was broken.The delivery system of the device was not received for analysis.A labeling review was performed and from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label."stent fracture" is a known complication associated with the use of this device, and is listed in the directions for use (dfu) / product label.Therefore, the root cause of this complaint is anticipated procedural complication.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.A search of the complaint database confirmed that no other complaints exist for the specified batch.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2015, that an ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent was implanted in the trachea during a stent placement procedure performed on (b)(^) 2015.According to the complainant, this was to treat a 4cm malignant obstruction.Reportedly, the patient's anatomy was not tortuous and was not pre dilated.During the procedure, the physician removed an ultraflex tracheobronchial stent that had been previously placed on an unknown date and was found to have migrated due to the decline in size of the tumor after therapy.The physician then implanted an 18mm x 6cm ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent.There were no issues noted and the stent was implanted successfully.Per the physician, the stent was not dilated after placement.On (b)(6) 2015, the patient informed the physician that he coughed up five pieces of metal that were believed to be part of the 18mm x 6cm ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent.A diagnostic bronchoscopy procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2015 and it was confirmed that the metal pieces were part of the 18mm x 6cm ultraflex tracheobronchial distal release covered stent that was placed on (b)(6) 2015.The remainder of the stent was removed using a stent grasper and rat tooth forceps.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX¿ TRACHEOBRONCHIAL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key5311710
MDR Text Key33905939
Report Number3005099803-2015-03542
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JCT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeZA
PMA/PMN Number
K012883
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/27/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/18/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/12/2017
Device Model NumberM00564870
Device Catalogue Number6487
Device Lot Number17879468
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/11/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/23/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age39 YR
-
-