• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. TEC 6 PLUS; VAPORIZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. TEC 6 PLUS; VAPORIZER Back to Search Results
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 12/08/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The unit was returned to ge healthcare for investigation.The unit was inspected and it was noted that the interlock plunger pin circlip was missing.The part was replaced and the unit is operational.
 
Event Description
During routine installation testing, the ge healthcare service representative noted the interlock system was not functional.There was no patient involvement.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TEC 6 PLUS
Type of Device
VAPORIZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DATEX-OHMEDA, INC.
3030 ohmeda drive
madison WI 53718
Manufacturer (Section G)
DATEX-OHMEDA, INC.
3030 ohmeda drive
madison WI 53718
Manufacturer Contact
stephanie cass
3000 n. grandview boulevard
waukesha, WI 53188-1696
MDR Report Key5317745
MDR Text Key34128424
Report Number2112667-2015-00441
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K000275
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/08/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/08/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/12/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-