• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION PRECISION®; SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number SC-3138-35
Device Problem Cut In Material (2454)
Patient Problem Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Date 12/02/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: model #: sc-3138-35, serial #: (b)(4), description: scs phiii ext 35cm.It is indicated that the devices will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint devices could not be completed.A review of the device history records will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental med watch will be filed.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient was experiencing inadequate stimulation.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the ipg was replaced.No device malfunction was suspected with the ipg.During the procedure while the extensions were removed from the lead, it was noted that the lead looked weird as it had a very wide space.The very end of the lead contact was cut off, and appeared to be damaged.The physician could not verify if the issue was from the device.However, when the physician plugged the lead into the header, everything lined up well.The patient was doing well postoperatively.No further course of action.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: model #: sc-3138-35, serial #: (b)(4), description: scs phiii ext 35cm.It is indicated that the devices will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint devices could not be completed.A review of the device history records will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
A report was received that the patient was experiencing inadequate stimulation.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein the ipg was replaced.No device malfunction was suspected with the ipg.During the procedure while the extensions were removed from the lead, it was noted that the lead looked weird as it had a very wide space.The very end of the lead contact was cut off, and appeared to be damaged.The physician could not verify if the issue was from the device.However, when the physician plugged the lead into the header, everything lined up well.The patient was doing well postoperatively.No further course of action.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISION®
Type of Device
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
talar tahmasian
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
6619494863
MDR Report Key5321729
MDR Text Key34196782
Report Number3006630150-2015-03333
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
030017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/02/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/30/2009
Device Model NumberSC-3138-35
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/02/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/17/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age49 YR
-
-