The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Portion of device was implanted in pst.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the superior mesenteric artery (sma) for a pseudo-aneurysm using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician successfully deployed and detached two ruby coils into the pseudo-aneurysm.While attempting to deploy a new ruby coil, the physician was unable to place the coil in the desired location and decided to remove it; however, the ruby coil unintentionally detached and the physician required a snare device to remove the coil.While the ruby coil was being removed from the patient, it began to unravel.The physician was able to remove most of the coil except for a portion of it, which migrated to the iliac artery.The physician left the piece of the ruby coil in the patient because it was insignificant and was not flow limiting.No other ruby coils were needed since the pseudo-aneurysm was successfully treated.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|