• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, INC. SYNCARDIA COMPANION 2 DRIVER; EXTERNAL PNEUMATIC DRIVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, INC. SYNCARDIA COMPANION 2 DRIVER; EXTERNAL PNEUMATIC DRIVER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 397002-001
Device Problems No Display/Image (1183); Mechanical Problem (1384); Poor Quality Image (1408); Pumping Stopped (1503); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/28/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the companion 2 driver display turned gray while the patient was in the operating room prior to heart transplant surgery.The customer also reported that the display turned gray when the nurse attempted to change the heart rate from 125 to 129 bpm (beats per minute).When the driver's display returned to normal, the beat rate was at 0 and the driver stopped pumping for a few seconds.The customer also reported that the hospital staff member was able to increase the beat rate and return the driver to fully functional by pushing the (+) sign on the driver.The customer also reported that the patient was successfully transplanted with a heart on the same day.There was no reported adverse patient impact.The companion 2 driver will be returned to syncardia for evaluation.The results of the investigation will be provided in a follow-up mdr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: there was no reported adverse patient impact.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the companion 2 driver display turned gray while the patient was in the operating room prior to heart transplant surgery.The customer also reported that the display turned gray when the nurse attempted to change the heart rate from 125 to 129 bpm (beats per minute).When the driver's display returned to normal, the beat rate was at 0 and the driver stopped pumping for a few seconds.The customer also reported that the hospital staff member was able to increase the beat rate and return the driver to fully functional by pushing the (+) sign on the driver.The customer also reported that the patient was successfully transplanted with a heart on the same day.There was no reported adverse patient impact.The companion 2 driver was returned to syncardia for evaluation.Visual inspection of the external components revealed no anomalies.During visual inspection of the internal components, no damage was observed on the corresponding cables that could potentially affect the driver's display.The low-voltage differential signaling (lvds) and liquid crystal display (lcd) inverter cables, which are responsible for the driver display, were manipulated during investigation testing, and the reported gray screen was not reproduced.Both were examined and were found to be free of damage.The electronic patient data file was reviewed, and various alarms standard to normal driver operation were observed.However, none of the alarms were indicative of a device malfunction or were relevant to the reported issue.If there was an unexpected shutdown or loss of communication, a "computer malfunction" alarm would be recorded in the patient data file, and an error code would be recorded in the eeprom data.No "computer malfunction" alarm or error code was recorded.The electronic patient data file showed a controlled descent of the beat rate over time as per standard protocols while preparing for bypass support.It is likely that during this time the beat rate was unintentionally lowered to zero bpm and then returned to its previous setting.However, this could not be confirmed.During investigation testing, it was observed that if the driver's beat rate was lowered to zero bpm and returned to its previous settings in less than a minute, the patient data file would not record the change.Decrease in beat rate was only achieved through intentional manipulation of the beat rate in operating room (or) mode.The investigation concluded that the companion 2 driver performed as intended, and there was no evidence of a device malfunction.The companion 2 driver was serviced and passed all final performance testing.There was no reported adverse impact to the patient as a result of the reported issue.Since the beat rate was able to be returned to the desired settings by the customer, the patient was not switched to a backup driver.This issue will continue to be monitored and trended as part of the customer experience process.Syncardia has completed its evaluation of this complaint and is closing this file.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCARDIA COMPANION 2 DRIVER
Type of Device
EXTERNAL PNEUMATIC DRIVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, INC.
1992 e. silverlake road
tucson AZ 85713
Manufacturer Contact
carole marcot
1992 e. silverlake road
tucson, AZ 85713
5205451234
MDR Report Key5347945
MDR Text Key35641134
Report Number3003761017-2016-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/06/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number397002-001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/08/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/21/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Disability;
Patient Age70 YR
-
-