Model Number SC-2316-50 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Kinked (1339); Cut In Material (2454)
|
Patient Problem
Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
|
Event Date 12/15/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Udi= (b)(4).Additional suspect medical device component involved in the event: model #: sc-2316-50, serial #: (b)(4), description: infinion1x16 perc lead kit-50 cm.Model #: sc-3400-30, serial #: (b)(4), description: infinion splitter 2x8 kit (30 cm).Model #: sc-4316, lot #: 16013535, description: next generation anchor kit-sterile.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that several contacts were producing high impedances.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein leads, lead splitters and clik anchor were replaced.No device malfunction suspected with the clik anchor.The physician felt that the clik anchor caused the malfunction of the leads.It was noted that the malfunction was somewhere between the lead splitters and leads.The patient was doing well post operatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Sc-2316-50 (sn (b)(4)) device evaluation indicated that visual inspection revealed that the lead body was kinked 1 cm from the retention sleeve, where it appears the lead was sutured.X-ray inspection revealed severed cables at the kinked section of the lead.This appears to have been caused by fatigue possibly coupled with postural changes/movements.The completely severed cables were the reason for the high impedances observed.There were no exposed cables at the kinked section of the lead.Additionally, proximal contacts #1-#7 were separated and found in the associated splitter.The lead body was also cleanly cut 7.5 cm from the proximal end.The root cause of the proximal end damage was unknown.The clean cut damage was a result of a typical explant procedure and it was not considered a failure.Sc-2316-50 (sn (b)(4)) device evaluation indicated that visual inspection revealed that the lead body was kinked 1 cm from the retention sleeve, where it appears the lead was sutured.X-ray inspection revealed severed cables at the kinked section of the lead.This appears to have been caused by fatigue possibly coupled with postural changes/movements.The completely severed cables were the reason for the high impedances observed.There were no exposed cables at the kinked section of the lead.Additionally, proximal contacts #1-#6 were separated and found in the associated splitter.The lead body was also cleanly cut 7.5 cm from the proximal end.The root cause of the proximal end damage was unknown.The clean cut damage was a result of a typical explant procedure and it was not considered a failure.Sc-3400-30 (sn (b)(4)) device evaluation indicated that the complaint was not confirmed.X-ray inspection revealed contacts lodged in the connector stacks.The associated leads were found to be the source of the complaint.Sc-4316 (lot # 16013535) device evaluation indicated that visual inspection revealed one eyelet was fractured and exhibited missing silicon.The cause of the damage was not determined.Additional information was received that the missing silicone was removed from the patient's body.
|
|
Event Description
|
A report was received that several contacts were producing high impedances.The patient underwent a revision procedure wherein leads, lead splitters and clik anchor were replaced.No device malfunction suspected with the clik anchor.The physician felt that the clik anchor caused the malfunction of the leads.It was noted that the malfunction was somewhere between the lead splitters and leads.The patient was doing well post operatively.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|