Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient initials are (b)(6).Patient weight was not provided by reporter.The patient specific implant was implanted; however, the complaint portion of the implant, the orbit, was not implanted.The complaint portion subject device is not expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation.The remainder of the subject device has been implanted in the patient.A device history record review was performed for the subject device.Documentation shows this device was manufactured and laser marked on 07 dec 2015 by the tech center prototype shop as per model specifications supplied by cmf product development.This device was then transported to the brandywine manufacturing plant for the following operations: inspection, dry ice blast, ultra sonic cleaning and plasma treatment which were completed on (b)(6) 2015.No inconsistencies were found during these processes.There were no non-conformances issued against this work order.Date of release to warehouse was (b)(4) 2015.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|