• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE PSI SD800.436 PEEK IMPLANT; PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY, PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE PSI SD800.436 PEEK IMPLANT; PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY, PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SD800.436
Device Problem Fitting Problem (2183)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/04/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: patient initials: (b)(4).Patient age, gender and weight are unknown.(b)(4).Device has not been reported as explanted.(b)(6).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reported that a patient specific implant (psi) peek implant was not fitting properly.It was reported that during surgery, there was a discrepancy of approximately four (4) millimeters on one side and two (2) millimeters on another between the patient's defect and the borders of the implant.No additional medical intervention was required.There was no time delay and the procedure was completed without further complications.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: a product development investigation was performed for the subject device.The subject device was not returned to the manufacturer for investigation therefore, no determination could be made regarding the condition of the patient specific implant.The device design (including patient ct image files), materials of construction, packaging, sterilization, labeling, user technique and manufacturing specifications were considered during the investigation to determine if any of these factors may have contributed or caused the complained event.The patient specific implant investigated as part of this complaint passed all design and manufacturing quality checks as proscribed by the relevant work instructions for psi design and manufacture.The fcd device was reproduced and reevaluated as part of the investigation.The fcd evaluation showed that the implant fit the defect as intended and did not show any signs of gapping as described in the complaint.The investigation did reveal that implantation of the device occurred approximately 5.5 months after ct scan acquisition date, changes to the patient anatomy between the date of scan and device implantation may have contributed to the complaint event.The investigation was dispositioned as unconfirmed.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The original date of awareness was reported as january 5, 2016 on the initial medwatch in error.The correct date of awareness for the issue was january 4, 2016.The date has been updated in the appropriate b4 field.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: review of the device history record showed that the implant was manufactured, inspected, and passed the required checks with no non-conformances identified.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PSI SD800.436 PEEK IMPLANT
Type of Device
PLATE, CRANIOPLASTY, PREFORMED, NONALTERABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5379420
MDR Text Key36647243
Report Number2520274-2016-10348
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK053199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/20/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSD800.436
Device Lot Number9947456
Other Device ID Number(01)10887587065083(10)9947456
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/16/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-