• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305U
Device Problem Structural Problem (2506)
Patient Problem Aortic Regurgitation (1716)
Event Date 01/04/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that two years, ten months post implant of this bioprosthetic aortic valve, it was replaced due to central regurgitation.Upon removal, a tear was found in the non-coronary leaflet.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the device was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the device was performed upon receipt.A remnant of glistening off-white pannus remained attached to the tissue and base stitching adjacent to the right cusp extending on the cusp showing possible evidence of a reduced inflow orifice area.Traces of pannus lined the inflow margin of attachment adjacent to all cusps extending onto the tunica into the right non-coronary inferior coaptive area.Remnants of pannus remained attached to the outflow adjacent to all stent posts and outflow rails adjacent to all cusps and along the sewing ring.An unknown amount of pannus appeared to have been removed on the inflow and outflow during explant.The leaflets appeared to have been excised for histopathology samples.The analysis of the device showed tears and abrasions through the free margin or lunula of the left and right cusps.Abrasions on the lunula of the non-coronary cusp appeared to be due to contact with the bias cloth along the outflow rail.The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Conclusion: based on the received information and the returned product analysis, the reported regurgitation is most likely due to the cuspal tears.The leaflets contacting with the bias cloth could be the potential cause of the tears.Cuspal tear due to contacting with bias cloth is a known potential risk and is addressed in the current risk management file.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5389784
MDR Text Key36850668
Report Number2025587-2016-00087
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/14/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/25/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Model Number305U
Device Catalogue Number305U225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/29/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00065 YR
-
-