Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information was not provided by reporter.(b)(4).Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is not expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation.Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.(b)(6).Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a surgical procedure to treat a femoral trochanteric fracture on (b)(6) 2016, after the surgeon attached the impactor to the blade, the surgeon could not move the shaft part of the blade.The surgeon decided to use a different sized blade to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences reported; however there was a reported surgical delay of unknown duration.This report is 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|