Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: although the product issue was discovered on (b)(6) 2016, it is unknown when the device ribbing portion (locking mechanism) was missing from the device.(b)(4).(b)(6).The subject device is not expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|