Catalog Number 03.802.431 |
Device Problem
Device Difficult to Maintain (3134)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 01/15/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient information not provided by reporter.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Device is expected to be returned to synthes manufacturer for evaluation /investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Device history records was conducted.The report indicates that the: manufacturing location: (b)(4), 03.802.431, lot# 9125361, manufacturing date: 29.Sep.2014, no ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (alif) surgery from l5-s1 was performed on (b)(6) 2016.Three issues were noted during this surgery.While attempting to tighten the retractor blade onto the synframe guide rod (387.358), the screw on the guide rod kept spinning then stripped.Surgery proceeded using the remaining 5 rods to distract the tissue.A 30 seconds delay was noted.The tapered u-joint driver(03.802.431) would not retain the screw.Surgeon used bone wax to hold the screw and driver together however, was unsuccessful.Another driver was used and screws were successfully implanted.No issues with the screws.A 15 seconds delay was noted.While disassembling the synframe holding ring (387.336) at the back table, the screw on one of the half ring (387.337) stripped.No issues with the device during assembly and while in used.No surgical delay noted.Procedure was successfully completed with a 45 seconds surgical delay total.No patient harm.No fragments generated.Devices will be returned for evaluation.This report (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A product investigation was completed: the returned instruments were examined and the complaint condition was able to be confirmed as the damage on the devices was consistent with the complainant¿s report.The head of the u-joint driver was deformed along the edges.Per the techique guide, the tapered u-joint driver is part of the synfix-lr system which is a stand-alone anterior interbody fusion device indicated for use in patients with degenerative disc disease (ddd).The instrument is specifically designed to insert 15- 30mm synfix locking screws.The u-joint mechanism of 03.802.431 is designed to allow the transmission of torque to the tip at angles not achievable by a straight driver.The associated drawings for the tapered u-joint driver were reviewed.The design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of these devices.A device history record review was performed for the tapered u-joint driver¿s and in each instance no material review reports, non-conformance reports or complaint-related issues were identified with the lots numbers which may have contributed to the complaint condition.The returned instruments were examined and the complaint condition was able to be confirmed in each instance as the distal driver tips were found to be worn.No definitive root cause was able to be determined however the failure mode is consistent with the application of torque when the tip is not fully seated into the screw drive recess.No definitive root cause could be identified however all the instruments display signs of normal wear and tear and use of excessive force.It is likely that the age of the devices and the use of excessive force contributed to the complaint condition.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|