The device was returned to mmdg for evaluation.A visual inspection and several alarm, error, and volumetric accuracy tests were performed.The device operated according to specifications.No failure could be detected.Mmdg was unable to duplicate the complaint.This is a retrospective filing.It is being submitted today because the therapy delay experienced by the patient required a visit to a medical facility for an interim feeding.
|
As recorded by customer service: "run 1 hr stops and start later, programmed correctly" unable to provide complete requested information.Went through set up with customer said the feed interval was off and pump ws set for 130 rate , 200 dose.Patient cannot do a bolus feed so they had to go to hospital for his feeding, no harm to patient just a delay in feeding." no further information was provided.(b)(4).
|