• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447) CARDIOBLATE CRYOFLEX; SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR ABLATION OF CARDIAC TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447) CARDIOBLATE CRYOFLEX; SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR ABLATION OF CARDIAC TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 60SF2
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 11/14/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
When using cryo equipment for maze procedure, the cryo handpiece broke and fell apart after the first use.New handpiece had to be given up onto field, which functioned fine.First handpiece was wrapped in biohazard bag with all labeling and packaging and given to front desk.Medtronic cardioblate cryoflex surgical ablation probe ref#60sf2.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARDIOBLATE CRYOFLEX
Type of Device
SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR ABLATION OF CARDIAC TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC. (MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447)
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
MDR Report Key5415940
MDR Text Key37635334
Report Number5415940
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OCL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/17/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/08/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model Number60SF2
Device Catalogue Number60SF2
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/06/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA11/17/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer11/17/2015
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
-
-