Device history record was confirmed for this device that it successfully passed criteria of manufacturing and inspection.Device was unavailable to be returned since it was discarded in the hospital.And investigation was conducted by only medical pictures provided.As a result of investigation with pictures at the time of procedure, lower part of stent was not fully expanded, and upper part of stent was partially expanded while other part was less expanded from picture taken 5 days later.On the other hand, stent was fully expanded at the picture during removal.It is regarded that stent couldn't be fully expanded due to patient's severe lesion status and it was migrated accordingly based on complaint description on which stated that part of stent was not expanded and moved to the top 5 days later since stent implantation.Furthermore, it is not considered that it was caused by device malfunction since stent was fully expanded during its removal.It is, however, impossible to identify the exact root cause since device was not returned and it is hard to recreate the situation at the time of procedure.We will continuously monitor whether similar or same complaint occurs.The suspected device is not registered to us fda and it has not been shipped into the us.
|
On (b)(6) 2015, successful implementation of stent.On (b)(6) 2015, patient claimed pain.On (b)(6) 2015, revision showed that stent not expanded in lower part and is moving to the top.On (b)(6) 2015, stent successfully removed and replaced be new one.No harm was caused to the patient.
|