• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 209999
Device Problems Failure to Read Input Signal (1581); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/04/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
The surgeon performed a makoplasty total hip arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio).During registering of the robot for reaming.The rio checkpoint failed and then multiple rio re-registration attempts failed as well.The surgery was completed using manual instruments.The case was successful and there was no harm to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding a failed reamer verification checkpoint involving 3.0 rio® robotic arm - mics, catalog: 209999 was reported.Method & results: device history review: a review of the dhr associated with rio 355 found quality inspection procedures successfully passed.Complaint history: based on the device identification (pn 209999) the complaint databases were reviewed from 2011 to present for similar reported events regarding failed rio registration.There were several other reported events.Conclusion: according to gsp case (b)(4), the fse noted the following: "while inspecting the system, i found debris on the j6 encoder glass and adjusted the read head for optimal signal strength.It was found barley passing.I performed kincal as well as an 8 cycle field hass with passing results.System ran for 6 hrs straight during testing without issue.Arm accuracy is great at.058mm for the lft and.041mm for the rht.Pm was also completed without issue.I did find in the logs that there were multiple j5 and j6 high torque warnings during the past few cases.This indicates that the dr¿s are being a bit aggressive during impaction and reaming.Also j2 bumpstops were knocked out of position.System is ready for clinical use.".
 
Event Description
The surgeon performed a makoplasty total hip arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio).During registering of the robot for reaming.The rio checkpoint failed and then multiple rio re-registration attempts failed as well.The surgery was completed using manual instruments.The case was successful and there was no harm to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
3.0 RIO® ROBOTIC ARM - MICS
Type of Device
STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan reeves
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale, FL 33317
9546280700
MDR Report Key5442513
MDR Text Key38410754
Report Number3005985723-2016-00061
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K141989
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/17/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue Number209999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-