(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The 4.0x19mm graftmaster device referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch mfr number.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a perforation in the right coronary artery.A 4.0x19mm graftmaster covered stent was successfully implanted, sealing the covered portion of the perforation, however the perforation was very large and the graftmaster was not long enough to cover the entire perforation.The 4.8x19mm graftmaster covered stent was advanced and deployed distal to the previously implanted graftmaster.During removal, the balloon of the 4.8x19mm graftmaster stent delivery system got stuck on the previously implanted graftmaster covered stent and stretched.The tip of the delivery system then separated.It is unclear whether or not the 4.8x19mm graftmaster covered stent successfully sealed the perforation.Pericardiocentesis was performed and then the patient was sent to surgery for coronary artery bypass graft (cabg), during which the separated tip of the 4.8x19mm graftmaster was removed.Although there was a clinically significant delay, post-procedure the patient is doing well.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: a visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported stretched material was confirmed.The reported tip detachment could not be confirmed.The reported device being damaged by another device, entrapment of the device and failure to seal the perforation could not be tested as they were based on operational circumstances.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the failure to seal the perforation; however, the reported stretched material, detachment of device, entrapment of device, device damaged by another device and the subsequent treatments appear to be related to the circumstances of the procedure.It was reported that the distal stent passed through the proximal stent during implantation.It should be noted that the graftmaster rapid exchange (rx), coronary stent graft system, instructions for use states: if more than one stent graft is required, the distal stent graft should be placed initially, followed by placement of the proximal stent graft.Stent graft placement in this order obviates the need to cross the proximal stent graft when placing the distal stent graft, and reduces the chances for dislodging the proximal stent graft.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|