• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 310C
Device Problems Structural Problem (2506); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem Mitral Regurgitation (1964)
Event Date 02/03/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that eleven months following implant of this bioprosthetic mitral valve, this valve was explanted and replaced due to moderate regurgitation resulting from a leaflet tear.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the returned product specimen was visually examined.All leaflets appeared intact and were found to be slightly stiff but flexible.The flat appearance on the top of the non-coronary commissure and bias cloth showed possible signs of pannus overgrowth which leaves the non-coronary cusp in the open position possibly resulting with restricted leaflet movement.A portion of the free margin of the non-coronary cusp appeared to fold back on itself, resting against the inner outflow rail.There was no evidence of a tear or damage on the leaflets.All commissures appeared to be intact.Remnants of pannus remained attached to the sewing ring on the inflow and outflow with traces on all stent posts.An unknown amount of pannus appears to have been removed on the inflow and outflow during explant.Radiography testing showed no evidence of mineralization in the valve and/or host tissue.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Based on the received information and the returned product analysis, the root cause to the reported regurgitation can be most likely attributed to the leaflet not coapting properly, secondary to the observed pannus overgrowth.Pannus overgrowth is associated with surgical valve replacement due to patient interaction and/or healing response with the surgical valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5457471
MDR Text Key38962618
Report Number2025587-2016-00229
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/12/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/24/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/12/2018
Device Model Number310C
Device Catalogue Number310C31
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/20/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/23/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Weight80
-
-