• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-P6
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Material Perforation (2205); Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem Injury (2348)
Event Date 02/10/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device referenced in this report was returned to olympus (b)(4) for evaluation.The bending rubber was torn and it was stretched and folded towards the distal side.The bending section of the subject device worked within the specifications.The surgeon thought that the fragments of the stone came to the proximal side of the bending section and when the scope was withdrawn, the scope became trapped on the undulations, and then the bending section of the scope was damaged.The subject device became trapped possibly by stones between the subject device and the ureter.The manufacturing record of the subject device was reviewed without irregularity.If additional information becomes available at a later time, this report will be supplemented.
 
Event Description
Olympus was informed that upon completion of a laser lithotripsy procedure, the surgeon was unable to withdraw the subject device as it was stuck.The surgeon had to perform open surgery to cut the ureter and remove the scope and then implant the ureter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device referenced in this report was sent to (b)(4) olympus for evaluation.According to the evaluation, the bending rubber was folded on the distal side and there was a cutting found on the proximal side.In addition, it was confirmed that there was a sliding mark on the insertion tube, and a cutting, uncounted pinholes on the bending rubber between 90mm and 50mm from the distal end on the up side, and between 90mm and 30mm on the down side.Nothing abnormal was confirmed on the bending shape and the bending movement.Further, a stain was found on the imager guide.From the above analysis, as a cause of this event, it is considered that the bending rubber was folded on the distal side and the diameter became larger, causing the scope to be stuck in the ureter.Though it has not been informed whether the user facility used the access sheath or not, if the access sheath was used, there is a possibility the distal end of the bending rubber was folded because the surgeon forcefully tried to withdraw the scope that was stuck in the access sheath.For the cause of the stain on the imager guide, it is considered that moisture was flooded through the cuttings or pinholes of the bending rubber.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO FIBERSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951
ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
susumu nishina
2951
ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
6425177
MDR Report Key5491365
MDR Text Key40024105
Report Number8010047-2016-00316
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FBN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K#: K912120
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/23/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/10/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-P6
Device Catalogue NumberURF-P6
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/12/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/30/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/04/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-