(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis with a tear in the outer member and separation of bayonet and support mandrel; however the device was still in one piece.The kink was able to be confirmed.Based on a visual inspection of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|