Catalog Number 8065752200 |
Device Problem
Aspiration Issue (2883)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/02/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A sample has been received and in-house evaluation is in progress.Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.No further information is expected.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A materiovigilance referent reported decrease in aspiration during irrigation/aspiration (i/a) phase.The issue was resolved by replacing the cassette.The issue occurred in the middle of the surgery and increased the time of surgery.No further information is expected.This is one of five reports being filed for this facility.This report refers to the issue that happened on (b)(6) 2016.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
For the first product lot associated with this report: a device history review of the reported lot showed that the product was built to specifications.The returned was visually inspected and it was found that the drain bag was intact and properly aligned on the cassette cover.The sample could be recognized and the service data could be retrieved from the console.The sample successfully passed priming and tuning.No leakage occurred between the aspiration luer and the handpiece during the tuning process.The cavity of the aspiration fitting was cavity 1.A maximum vacuum within specification was reached during testing.The irrigation and aspiration flow rates were within specification.Neither leakage, nor occlusion was detected from the tubing insertion to the fittings and the four aspiration ports on the pump region of the cassette base.The sample passed both visual and functional testing.The root cause of the customer's complaint could not be established as the returned sample met specifications.For the second product lot associated with this report; a device history review of the reported lot showed that the product was built to specifications.The customer did not retain a sample for this complaint report; therefore, visual inspection and functional testing could not be conducted.The root cause of the customer's complaint could not be established as a sample has not been received.An internal investigation has been opened to address reports of a similar nature.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
For the first product lot associated with this report: a device history review of the reported lot showed that the product was built to specifications.The returned was visually inspected and it was found that the drain bag was intact and properly aligned on the cassette cover.The sample could be recognized and the service data could be retrieved from the console.The sample successfully passed priming and tuning.No leakage occurred between the aspiration luer and the handpiece during the tuning process.The cavity of the aspiration fitting was cavity 1.A maximum vacuum within specification was reached during testing.The irrigation and aspiration flow rates were within specification.Neither leakage, nor occlusion was detected from the tubing insertion to the fittings and the four aspiration ports on the pump region of the cassette base.The sample passed both visual and functional testing.The root cause of the customer's complaint could not be established as the returned sample met specifications.For the second product lot associated with this report; a device history review of the reported lot showed that the product was built to specifications.The customer did not retain a sample for this complaint report; therefore, visual inspection and functional testing could not be conducted.The root cause of the customer's complaint could not be established as a sample has not been received.An internal investigation has been opened to address reports of a similar nature.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|