• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTSFT0820
Device Problems Break (1069); Use of Device Problem (1670); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/16/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock on the proximal end of the penumbra smart coil (smart coil) pusher assembly was broken; the pusher was fractured approximately 184.0 cm from the proximal end; a segment of the pusher assembly approximately 3.5 cm long of the distal tip was fractured off and separated from the rest of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil to the smart coil was not returned for evaluation.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pusher assembly was fractured.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the rotating hemostasis valve (rhv) was not completely opened upon withdrawal of the device, the distal segment of the pusher assembly may become damaged.Smart coils are 100% functionally tested during in-process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician successfully delivered another manufacturer's coil and a smart coil into the patient.The physician then removed the smart coil's pusher assembly from the rotating hemostasis valve (rhv) with no issue and no noticeable friction.However, while inserting a new smart coil into the rhv, the physician observed that approximately 5 centimeters of the first smart coil's pusher assembly was stuck inside the transparent body of the rhv.The physician indicated that she may not have fully opened the rhv while retracting the pusher assembly of the first smart coil, which may have caused the pusher assembly to break inside the rhv.The physician removed the rhv and continued the procedure using a new rhv to deliver the second smart coil and a new smart coil into the patient.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the initial reporter's address that was reported on the initial mfr report was obtained via a web search engine because it was unknown at the time of the report.Since then, the manufacturer has obtained the correct address and it is being corrected on this report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key5505808
MDR Text Key40533225
Report Number3005168196-2016-00316
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548014753
UDI-Public00814548014753
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K151572
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/16/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/16/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date12/15/2020
Device Catalogue Number400SMTSFT0820
Device Lot NumberF66987
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/03/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/16/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/17/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age45 YR
-
-