It was reported that when removing the dressing, the nurse found the blue scrim was separated from the foam.The patch had been placed fifty hours prior to when the issue was found, but it is not known when the separation occurred.Another product was pulled and placed on the patient's port.No adverse patient consequences reported.The product was disposed.
|
Integra has completed their internal investigation on march 31, 2016.The investigation included: methods: review of complaints history.Results: evaluation of returned device; the sample was disposed of.The complaint could not be confirmed since no sample (or photo) was returned for evaluation.Dhr review; no lot number was reported as part of this event.Complaints history; upon review of integra's complaint system from march 2014- march 2016, a total of (b)(4) complaints (including this one) related to same issue of blue scrim delamination for biopatch product family conclusion: the complaint description states that the patch had been placed fifty hours when the delamination was noticed during product removal.There is no information regarding if there was exudation from the wound.The polyurethane disk contacting the wound acts like a sponge that absorbs exudate/moisture from the wound.With highly exudative wounds, the moisture from the exudate could soften the medical grade acrylic adhesive and make the blue nylon reinforced film (scrim) more easily to peel.In this case, detachment of the blue nylon reinforced film from the biopatch disk is possible due to the pulling force exerted during the removal of the transparent film dressing that secures the device and biopatch disk to the skin.Since detachment of the blue nylon reinforced film (scrim) is most likely to occur during removal of the biopatch disk, which is then discarded, it has no impact on patient care.
|