• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number XRX04009T
Device Problem Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problems Intimal Dissection (1333); Stroke/CVA (1770); Occlusion (1984)
Event Date 02/26/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4) it is indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.The reported difficulties appear to be due to case circumstances.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.A query of the electronic complaint handling database revealed no other similar incidents from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.The reported patient effects of dissection, occlusion, and stroke are known observed and potential patient effect as listed in the xact carotid stent system instruction for use (ifu).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily tortuous and heavily calcified internal carotid artery below the bifurcation.An emboshield nav6 was deployed distal to the lesion.Pre-dilatation was performed with a 3.0 x 20 mm trek balloon catheter.A 9-7 x 40 mm xact stent was advanced to the lesion but could not cross and was removed.Additional pre-dilatation was performed with a 5 x 20 mm viatrac balloon catheter.Angiography was performed and flow was present distal to the lesion.The xact stent was again advanced to the lesion and there was some difficulty crossing; however, the stent did cross and was successfully deployed which caused the artery to kink distal to the stent.Post deployment angiography showed an occlusion at the carotid bifurcation which occluded the left internal carotid artery.The patient was taken to surgery.The patient suffered a middle cerebral stroke and the neurological deficit is unknown.There was a clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the previously filed medwatch report, additional information was received stating that the patient is at (b)(6) rehabilitation with essentially dense hemiplegia.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key5514573
MDR Text Key40812705
Report Number2024168-2016-01769
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
P040038
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/21/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2018
Device Catalogue NumberXRX04009T
Device Lot Number5021061
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/07/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention; Disability;
-
-