(b)(4).It is indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.Based on the reported information, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties appear to be due to case circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.Although it was reported that the inflation lumen was inadvertently flushed instead of the guide wire lumen during preparation, the error does not appear to have contributed to the reported difficulties.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a popliteal lesion with heavy calcification.The 4.5 mm x 40 mm x 135 cm rx viatrac was prepped outside the body; however, the technician filled the inflation lumen thinking it was the guide wire lumen.No resistance was noted during removal of the protective sheath.There was resistance during advancement to the target lesion and due to the patient anatomy the balloon tore and a segment of the catheter with the balloon on it partially separated from the catheter and they could not get to the lesion.There was also resistance during retraction of the balloon catheter; however, the catheter with balloon on it was removed from the patient over the guide wire without losing access.The procedure was completed with balloon dilatation and a stent.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.There was no adverse patient effect.No additional information was provided.
|