• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 3116
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Unintended Collision (1429)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Date 10/11/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other applicable components are: product id: 4351-35, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, explanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type: lead.Product id: 4351-35, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, explanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type: lead.Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is completed.
 
Event Description
The health care provider (hcp) via a manufacturer representative reported that the patient did well for the first several months and then about a year after receiving the device, the patient had a bad fall.A follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) at the time did not reveal lead migration or abnormal impedance readings.The patient was managed trying different stimulation settings, but never returned to their previous outcomes before the fall.A second egd revealed a bulge in the mucosa/submucosa of the patient's stomach where the leads were.An x-ray of the stomach also revealed that the device had moved and rotated in the pocket site.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient was sent for a complete system revision to replace the leads and stimulator.The battery was explanted as it was close to expiration and this was considered normal battery depletion.The procedure was successful and the implant impedance was 448 ohms with the new system.There was no patient death.The indication for use for this patient was gastric stimulation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of the ins ((b)(4)) found no anomaly.Analysis of the tined leads ((b)(4)) found that the lead body was cut through and the products were segmented.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 4351-35, lot/serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, explanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type: lead.Product id: 4351-35, lot/serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, explanted: (b)(6) 2016, product type: lead.Life threatening was removed as it was incorrectly applied.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERRA
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key5544722
MDR Text Key41771610
Report Number3004209178-2016-05954
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/14/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/14/2015
Device Model Number3116
Device Catalogue Number3116
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/30/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2016
Initial Date FDA Received04/04/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
04/20/2016
06/14/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/09/2016
09/21/2017
06/14/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/21/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age00048 YR
-
-