The articular surface was returned for review.Visual inspection reveals severe delamination and discoloration centrally located where the femoral component would articulate on the poly, proximal surface.Delamination and discoloration is also observed on the distal surface.There is also some additional wear on the medial edge of the component.This wear likely resulted after the central articulating surface wore and tracking of the femoral component would have compensated for the wear.Dimensions were found conforming to print specifications where measured.Device history records were reviewed with no deviations or anomalies identified.The exact implantation date is unknown, but based on the manufacturing date (1991) and explant date (2015), the component could have been in situ from 15 to 24 years.This device is used for treatment.Primary operative notes were not returned for review.Revision operative notes confirm the patient underwent revision due to a thinned poly, previously confirmed with arthroscopy.Bone scans showed some increased uptake in both the femoral and tibial components, but these were found to be well fixed; therefore, only the articular surface exchange was performed.Inspection of the component revealed lamination and pitting and that it was so thin you could almost see the metal-backed tibial plate.The patellar component had some cold flow, but no pitting or delamination and therefore was not revised.Post-operative x-rays confirmed good anatomic alignment.A product history search revealed no additional complaints against the related part and lot combination.Based on the pattern of wear and the estimated in situ time, it is likely that the required revision of the articular surface was due to wear and tear from use.
|