Information was received from a surgeon who is not required to complete form 3500a.Visual inspection determined that the device exhibits significant wear and damage indicative of extensive use in the field, thus demonstrating the device was used effectively prior to the submission of this complaint.The device has a potential field age of approximately 7.5 years.A hardness reading of the returned device indicates the hardness is within print specifications.A functional examination of the device shows that the actuating tip within the teardrop feature does not effectively protrude.The actuating tip does not protrude sufficiently due to interference between the tip and the main body of the device.The locking mechanism of the slider pin is frozen in the inserter frame, causing the mechanism of the device to be ineffective.This interference is caused by mechanical damage to both the tip and the body.The device was used for treatment.The exact cause of this damage cannot be determined.It is likely a combination of normal wear and tear and incidental damage caused by impaction during use.Based on the nature of the failure, the potential field age of the device, and the evidence of prior effective use, no product issues are identified as a result of this reported event.This mdr was identified during an internal retrospective review to meet reporting requirements and therefore is being filed retrospectively.
|