|
Catalog Number MC1810 |
Device Problems
Bent (1059); Failure to Prime (1492); Self-Activation or Keying (1557)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 03/16/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The lot number for the device has been provided.A review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an ultrasound-guided liver biopsy into normal tissue the device allegedly failed to prime and allegedly self-activated in formalin.It was further reported that the procedure was completed with the same device.There was no report of patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: a lot history review was conducted and it was determined that a device history record (dhr) review was not required.Visual inspection: the sample was returned.Both slides were in their initial position.The cannula and stylet were found bent to the right when positioned on a flat surface.The bent started approximately 2.99" from the base of the needle.It is unknown when and/or how the bend occurred.The top slide was pulled back and the no anomalies were noted to the sample notch.Performance/functional evaluation: functional testing could not be performed due to the bent needle.Dimensional evaluation: the notch thickness of the sample was measured and found to be within specification.Medical records review: as medical records were not provided, a review could not be performed.Image/photo review: no medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.Conclusion: the investigation is confirmed for bend, as the needle was found to be bent.However, the investigation is inconclusive for self-activation, as the device could not be functionally tested due to the bent needle.During sample evaluation, the needle was found to be bent which could have contributed to the self-activation issue.All maxcore needles are visually inspected for bends before and after assembly at manufacturing.Therefore, it is unlikely that the root cause is manufacturing related.Furthermore, it is unknown whether shipping and/or handling issues contributed to the event.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: the current maxcore instructions for use (ifu) provides general instructions for use of the device, as well as warnings, precautions, and potential complications associated with the device.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was performed.The lot met all release criteria.X-ray: the returned maxcore device was examined via x-ray imaging prior to functional testing.The image attached shows the left side bumper to be missing within the device.Conclusion: the investigation is confirmed for bend, as the needle was found to be bent.However, the investigation is inconclusive for self-activation and failure to prime, as the device could not be functionally tested due to the bent needle.During sample evaluation, the left side bumper was found to be missing which could have contributed to the reported priming issue; however, the definitive root cause for the reported event could not be determined based upon available information.Additionally, sample evaluation found the needle to be bent.It is unclear when the needle became bent, as the issue was not reported by the user.As all maxcore needles are visually inspected for bends before and after assembly at manufacturing, it is unlikely that the root cause for the bent needle is manufacturing related.It is unknown whether shipping and/or handling issues contributed to the bend.(b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|