• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. SARNS CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM; CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS - SARNS CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP. SARNS CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM; CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS - SARNS CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 6382
Device Problem Invalid Sensing (2293)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Customer has ordered a replacement flow sensor.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during use of the device for a cardiopulmonary bypass (cpb) procedure, the flow sensor was not sensing flow.As a result, an alternate device was employed.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no delay, no blood loss, nor adverse consequences to the patient.Per the clinical review on (b)(6) 2016: according to the perfusionist (ccp), no issues with flow measurement were observed during prime and preparation of the cpb circuit.During cpb, a few backflow alarms were posted with no clinical evidence of backflow.The ccp also noticed the flow display was erratically changing from 1- 7 liters per minute (l/min) even though no changes in pump speed were made.The ccp disconnected the flow sensor from the control module and reconnected and the flow measurement appeared steady for about three to four minutes and then the erratic displays re-occurred.The ccp elected to take a flow sensor from an unused control module and he connected this new sensor to his system and the tubing.This mitigated the issue and flow sensing was steady for the remainder of the procedure.There were no issues with motor function or actual provided flow rates.The case was completed successfully, without delay and without associated blood loss.There was no harm observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per follow-up with the perfusionist (ccp): the flow measurement issue observed was normally 1800 to 2000 revolutions per minute (rpm), was with tubing and was also clamped at the time of the issue; the flow measurements were running negative/positive erratic; the tubing clamp was located between the patient and the sensor; there was a flow sensor within the circuit and located between the pump and oxygenator (exit oxygenator to patient); and there was no damage noted to the flow sensor, it's cable or it's connector.Per follow-up with the field service representative (fsr) on 05-may-2016: he was told by the user facility¿s biomedical engineer (biomed) that it was an intermittent issue.The biomed replaced the flow sensor and he disposed of the faulty flow sensor.No part will be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SARNS CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS - SARNS CENTRIFUGAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CORP.
6200 jackson road
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer Contact
jan winder
6200 jackson road
ann arbor, MI 48103
7346634145
MDR Report Key5572974
MDR Text Key43019175
Report Number1828100-2016-00245
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K950739
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/13/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number6382
Device Catalogue Number6382
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/04/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/17/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-