STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH RESTORATION ADM X3 INS 28/50; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, NON-POROUS, CALICU
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1236-2-850 |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Scratched Material (3020)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
Event Date 03/17/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A supplemental report will be submitted, upon completion of the investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient originally underwent a tha using an adept and a super secur fit and the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2015 due to pain of inguinal region.The adept cup and super secur fit were left in the patient and implanted adm/adm 50mm insert and 28mm metal head +4mm (cat.: 6260-5-228, lot.45132001).And dislocation was occurred on (b)(6) 2016 and reduction was conducted by the surgeon.The surgeon observed that the patient has a internal dislocation with ct on (b)(6).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding dislocation involving an adm liner was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: scratching and indentation marks were noted on the surface of the liner.Medical records received and evaluation: a medical review was performed and concluded: "no evidence is present to suggest that device-related matters have played a role while the clinical context and radiological information provide a plausible failure scenario as based upon cup malposition that was persistent leading at first to a revision because of groin pain in 2015 due to iliopsoas tendinitis and because the cup shell was retained in malposition with only a liner exchange, a second revision in 2016 became required because of dislocation.This pi case is not device-related." "cup malposition in absent anteversion has caused a dislocation which because of presence of an adm liner was of the intra-prosthetic type and thus required open revision surgery." device history review: all devices in the reported lot were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusions: a medical review was performed and concluded that the root cause of the dislocation was related to cup malposition (competitor device).Further to this there was no evidence of device related factors.No further investigation is required at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient originally underwent a tha using an adept and a super secur fit and the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2015 due to pain of inguinal region.The adept cup and super secur fit were left in the patient and implanted adm/adm 50mm insert and 28mm metal head +4mm (cat.: 6260-5-228, lot.45132001).And dislocation was occured on (b)(6) 2016 and reduction was conducted by the surgeon.The surgeon observed that the patient has a internal dislocation with ct on (b)(6).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|