• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET MICROFIXATION HARD TISSUE REPLACEMENT PATIENT-MATCH IMPLANT (RIGHT FRONTAL PARIETAL TEMPORAL)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET MICROFIXATION HARD TISSUE REPLACEMENT PATIENT-MATCH IMPLANT (RIGHT FRONTAL PARIETAL TEMPORAL) Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Fitting Problem (2183)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 03/21/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of device history records show that the lot was released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.The warnings in the package insert state this type of event can occur.The user facility is foreign; therefore, a facility medwatch report will not be available.The product was implanted into the patient and therefore will not be returned for an evaluation.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.(b)(4).Report one (1) of two (2) for the same event.Report 2 of 2 is reported on 0001032347-2016-00174.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a bilateral case, two (2) separate implants did not fit well and required significant modification to achieve proper fit.The left side was implanted first and the right side was implanted second.The curvature of the first (left) implant in the temporal area was too concave and a backup implant was used to fill the gaps and bolster the implant up in order to achieve the desired cosmetic result.The second (right) implant was said to be better but still required significant modification to achieve proper fit.The increase in surgical time was thirty-eight (38) minutes for the first (left) implant and less than thirty (30) minutes (exact time is unknown) for the second (right) implant.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The products were not returned for evaluation, however the patient's scans, photographs of the procedure, and manufacturing process for the implants were evaluated by the manufacturer.Based on the evaluation, the complaint was confirmed through intraoperative pictures.The most-likely, underlying cause was determined to be the patient's anatomy between the time of the ct scan and the time of the surgery.The ct scan was 285 days old at the time of the surgery.Based on the review of the manufacturing process during the evaluation, the scans determined that the implants were manufactured according to design requirements provided by the customer and met all acceptance requirements.Additionally, "the digital mold, mold of mold, and implant files were all examined and no design flaws were found.The parts were examined to ensure no gaps or overlaps existed between parts that could lead to the caste implant being too large or different from the implant design." also, "scan date was (b)(6) 2015 and the surgery date was (b)(6) 2016.No post op scans were provided for verification.The time between the scan data and surgery may have allowed for bone growth or movement resulting in the improper fit of the implant." this is report 2 of 2 for the same event.Report 1 of 2 is reported on mfr #0001032347-2016-00174-1.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HARD TISSUE REPLACEMENT PATIENT-MATCH IMPLANT (RIGHT FRONTAL PARIETAL TEMPORAL)
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET MICROFIXATION
1520 tradeport drive
jacksonville FL 32218
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET MICROFIXATION
1520 tradeport drive
jacksonville FL 32218
Manufacturer Contact
michelle cole
1520 tradeport drive
jacksonville, FL 32218
9047414400
MDR Report Key5584651
MDR Text Key42895024
Report Number0001032347-2016-00173
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KKY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
PK924935
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/18/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/16/2019
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberPM617644-B
Device Lot Number664590
Other Device ID NumberSEE H10 NARRATIVE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/18/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-