• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 505DA
Device Problems Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/21/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: product analysis and investigation are anticipated but have not yet been completed.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that immediately following implant of this mechanical valve in the pulmonary position, it was explanted and replaced due to leaflet jam.It was noted that the mechanical sizer was not set to the appropriate size during attempted implant, and a larger size was implanted.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the returned product specimen was visually examined.The valve was discolored showing evidence of blood contact.The existing leaflet was in the closed position.The leaflet appeared intact with no evidence of damage such as cracks and/or surface anomalies.Both inflow and outflow orifices and valve hinge mechanisms appeared intact with no evidence of damage.Using a blue actuator to test leaflet movement, the one leaflet appeared to move without difficulty.The valve was rinsed under tap water and it was verified that the carbon subassembly rotated in the sewing ring.The sewing ring was removed by systematically undoing the stitching to expose the stiffening ring window.The lock wire was pulled out and the stiffening ring removed from the orifice.The serial number was verified.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.A conclusive cause of the reported event could not be determined.Based on the analysis, the complaint could not be confirmed and no evidence of a leaflet motion issue was noted.However, based on the received information, the physician indicated that the cause of this event was a sizing error.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the returned product specimen was visually examined.The valve was discolored, showing evidence of blood contact.The existing leaflet was in the closed position.The leaflet appeared to be intact with no evidence of damage such as cracks and/or surface anomalies.Both inflow and outflow orifices and valve hinge mechanisms appeared to be intact with no evidence of damage.Using a blue actuator to test leaflet movement, both leaflets appeared to move without difficulty.The valve was rinsed under tap water and it was verified that the carbon subassembly rotated in the sewing ring.The sewing ring was removed by systematically undoing the stitching to expose the stiffening ring window.The lock wire was pulled out and the stiffening ring removed from the orifice.The serial number was verified.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed.The valve was built to specification and met all inspection and acceptance criteria.A conclusive cause of the reported event could not be determined.Based on the analysis, the complaint could not be confirmed and there was no evidence of a leaflet motion issue.However, based on the received information, the physician indicated that the cause of this event was a sizing error.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC AP
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5586122
MDR Text Key42938634
Report Number3008592544-2016-00023
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/31/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/18/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/08/2020
Device Model Number505DA
Device Catalogue Number505DA16
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/24/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/31/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/10/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00006 MO
-
-