• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. BARD POLY MIDLINE CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC. BARD POLY MIDLINE CATHETER Back to Search Results
Device Problems Stretched (1601); Device Issue (2379)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/22/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
When rn was pulling back the stylet/wire inside the midline catheter to line them up together, she noticed the wire she was pulling was longer than what it usually is and both were not lining up as they should.The wire appeared to have "stretched out" and part of it had split in two.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARD POLY MIDLINE CATHETER
Type of Device
BARD POLY MIDLINE CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS, INC.
605 north
5600 west
salt lake city UT 84116
MDR Report Key5595034
MDR Text Key43325113
Report Number5595034
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/12/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/15/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/13/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA04/12/2016
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/22/2016
Device Age NA
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer04/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
-
-