Model Number NEXHD1552801 |
Device Problem
Improper Flow or Infusion (2954)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 04/04/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation because the device remains implanted; therefore an analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the manufacturing documentation confirmed that the lot met the specification requirements.The review found no deviations or non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Taking into consideration the evaluation conducted and the details of the complaint, this investigation was assigned the most probable root cause of an anticipated procedural complication.A complaint with a most probable root cause classification of an anticipated procedural complication indicates that a device related root cause does not apply and the complaint is due to a known effect of the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
(b)(4): the device was successfully placed in this (b)(6) female patient on (b)(6) 2015.Poor flow was reported on 04 apr 2016.No action was taken with the study device.Cathflo was given to treat the poor flow.The event resolved on the same date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation because the device has been disposed; therefore an analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the manufacturing documentation confirmed that the lot met the specification requirements.The review found no deviations or non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported complaint.Taking into consideration the evaluation conducted and the details of the complaint, this investigation was assigned the most probable root cause of an anticipated procedural complication.A complaint with a most probable root cause classification of an anticipated procedural complication indicates that a device related root cause does not apply and the complaint is due to a known effect of the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient had her device removed on (b)(6) 2016 due to flow issues.The original flow issues were thought to be resolved after a dose of cathflo but ended up continuing.The device was disposed of after removal.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information provided by electronic data provider indicated that the (second) low flow event started on (b)(6) 2016.The event resolved on (b)(6) 2016.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|