• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MAKOPLASTY® PARTIAL KNEE END EFFECTOR; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MAKOPLASTY® PARTIAL KNEE END EFFECTOR; STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 111758
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/05/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
The surgeon performed a partial knee arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio).During the case, the magnet from the end effector fell off.This did not affect the case or the patient.Another instrument was used and the breakage did not affect the outcome of the case which was successful.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: the event reported that the magnet of a partial knee end effector was missing.The failure was noticed during a cadaver lab and not associated with a case or patient.Device history review: review of device history records indicate (b)(4) devices on 11/24/15, (b)(4) devices on 11/25/15, (b)(4) devices on 12/03/15, (b)(4) devices on 12/07/15, and (b)(4) devices on 12/10/15 were accepted into final stock.The one device (s/n (b)(4)) was rejected for no bead blast performed and disposition was (b)(4).The non-conformance was not related to the alleged failure investigation and did not affect the failed device.Device evaluation and results: -visual inspection: the magnet was missing.No signs of residue was seen.-dimensional inspection: visual inspection confirmed the failure.-functional inspection: visual inspection confirmed the failure.Complaint history review: review of complaints within the trackwise database based on p/n 111758, l/n 19320515 show (b)(4) complaints related to the alleged failure in this complaint.(b)(4).Tracking of complaints related to p/n 111758 will be tracked through (b)(4).Conclusions: the failure was confirmed that the trigger magnet was missing from the device.Corrective action / preventive action: no action is required at this time as there is no indication to suggest a product non-conformity or unanticipated hazard.
 
Event Description
The surgeon performed a partial knee arthroplasty using the robotic arm interactive orthopedic system (rio).During the case, the magnet from the end effector fell off.This did not affect the case or the patient.Another instrument was used and the breakage did not affect the outcome of the case which was successful.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAKOPLASTY® PARTIAL KNEE END EFFECTOR
Type of Device
STEREOTACTIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
liza gordillo
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale, FL 33317
9546280700
MDR Report Key5644305
MDR Text Key44853799
Report Number3005985723-2016-00152
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112507
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/05/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/10/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number111758
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/26/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-