(b)(6).The device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to wear from normal use and servicing over time.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported by (b)(6) that the angle attachment device was getting hot when in use.During service and evaluation it was found that the device had a cosmetic defect.It was noted that the device had worn bearings and was missing some color markings on the housing.It was further noted that the device failed pre-repair diagnostic tests for visual assessment, cutter insertion and temperature assessment.It was not reported if the malfunction occurred during a surgical procedure.It was reported that there was no delay in a surgical procedure due to the event.It was not reported if a spare device was available for use.There was no patient or user involvement reported.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of this event was unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|