• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CREATININE PLUS VER.2; ENZYMATIC METHOD, CREATININE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CREATININE PLUS VER.2; ENZYMATIC METHOD, CREATININE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03263991190
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/18/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).
 
Event Description
The customer complained of erroneous results for one icu patient who had undergone a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and was tested for creatinine plus ver.2 (crep2).The erroneous results were reported outside of the laboratory.Prior to the operation, on (b)(6) 2016 the patient had a crep2 result on a c501 instrument of 400++ umol/l.A day after the operation, on (b)(6) 2016, a new sample was obtained and the crep2 result on the c501 instrument was 73 umol/l.The physician questioned the result and sent the sample from (b)(6) 2016 to an external laboratory where the result from a siemens instrument using the picric acid method was 400 umol/l.The customer decided to repeat both samples on (b)(6) 2016.The initial sample from (b)(6) 2016 was tested on a c702 instrument and the creatinine jaffe gen.2 (crej2) result was 486 umol/l.The crep2 repeat result from a c502 instrument was 469 umol/l.The sample from(b)(6) 2016 was repeated on the c702 instrument and the crej2 result was 383 umol/l.The crep2 repeat result from the c502 instrument was 161 umol/l.It was noted that all samples obtained were venous.No adverse event occurred.The patient is being administered the antibiotic sulperazone which is a third generation cephalosporin.It was suggested that there may be an interference with the crep2 assay.It was noted that product labeling for crej2 indicates that antibiotics containing cephalosporin can lead to significant false positive values.This explains the higher crej2 results.Based on the calibration and quality control information, there is no issue with the crep2 reagent or the instrument.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Since calibration and quality controls were acceptable a general reagent or hardware issue can be excluded.A specific root cause could not be identified.Additional information for further investigation was requested but was not provided.It was noted that dopamine can interfere with crep tests if the patient is treated with high doses or if the blood sample was taken from a venous catheter where the drug was administered.A possible root cause for the discrepant crep2 results might be due to an incorrect blood draw through a venous catheter where dopamine was administered previously.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CREATININE PLUS VER.2
Type of Device
ENZYMATIC METHOD, CREATININE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key5653316
MDR Text Key45202557
Report Number1823260-2016-00631
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JFY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMY
PMA/PMN Number
K024098
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Medical Assistant
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/13/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2016
Device Catalogue Number03263991190
Device Lot Number115655
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/20/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-