The reported defective device has been returned to the manufacturer for a device evaluation.The results of the device evaluation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.A review of the device history records was performed for the reported packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.Complaint # (b)(4).
|
As reported (b)(6) 2016, a (b)(6), male patient presented for an angiographic procedure.During the case, after the angiographic catheter had been placed, the strain relief detached and slid down the catheter shaft and into the insertion site.The strain relief was removed with no complications or patient effect.The catheter was removed and set aside.A new of the same was used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no harm or injury to the patient due to this event.The reported defective disposable device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
|
Returned for evaluation was a accu-vu catheter.The hub was not received for evaluation.A visual review of the catheter noted that the hub was missing and the strain relief falls loosely along the shaft of the device.The material at the end of the shaft, where the hub is attached, appears stretched.The customer's reported complaint description of the strain relief detaching is confirmed.A definitive root cause for the reported complaint description cannot be determined, although it does not appear to be manufacturing related.During the sample analysis, the portion of the shaft where the strain relief is molded to the hub processes damage that could have been caused by excessive force or torque.Though it cannot be definitely determined, the most likely cause to this complaint is due to handling techniques during the procedure.A review of the device history records was performed for the reported packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly, and performance specifications.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Complaint # (b)(4).
|